AI Legal Research vs. ChatGPT

    Comparison: why lawyers should use a source-based solution like iureka instead of ChatGPT for legal research.

    ChatGPT and iureka both use large language models — but legal research requirements are fundamentally different.

    At a glance

    CriterionChatGPTiureka
    Legal databaseNo (knowledge cutoff)680,000+ cases, 145,000 statutes, etc.
    Cited sourcesUnreliable / no guaranteeReferences with document viewer
    CurrencyModel-dependentDaily updated data sources
    GDPR / firm dataGeneral OpenAI policiesEU-oriented platform for lawyers
    DOCX / vault / agentsNoIntegrated

    When ChatGPT makes sense

    • General wording help without legal context
    • Brainstorming on non-legal topics
    • Quick summaries without citation requirements

    When iureka is the better choice

    • Case law and statute research with verifiable sources
    • Client work with confidentiality requirements
    • Recurring research workflows via agents
    • Working with your own documents in vaults

    Conclusion

    ChatGPT is a versatile language tool. iureka is a legal research platform — built for lawyers who must substantiate their results.

    Try iureka

    Start with AI legal research — try anonymously on the homepage or with a free account.

    Register for free

    Related pages